Thursday, October 10, 2013

31 Days of Books: Animal Farm

Title:  Animal Farm

Author:  George Orwell

Published:  1945

Year I read it:  2006

One sentence summary:  This classic allegory is the tale of farm animals who revolt against farm hierarchy to create a communist state.

Interesting fact:  The original title was - Animal Farm: A Fairy Story.

Three reasons to read it:
  • This is a brilliant allegory!  It's really an extended fable that does a superb job of proving a fallacy. 
  • It is a fun read.  If you're not laughing while reading, you might want to pick up a copy of the Communist Manifesto or at least some thoughts from Lenin/Stalin so as to fully enjoy Orwell's satirical treatment of them.
  • If you're like me and 1984 seems... not daunting, but something for later, read Animal Farm.
One reason you maybe shouldn't:
  • Orwell was still a socialist - just one staunchly opposed to communism.  Just something some may want to be aware of.
Great quote:

The original Animalist Commandments:
  1. Whatever goes upon two legs is an enemy.
  2. Whatever goes upon four legs, or has wings, is a friend.
  3. No animal shall wear clothes.
  4. No animal shall sleep in a bed.
  5. No animal shall drink alcohol.
  6. No animal shall kill any other animal.
  7. All animals are equal.
“Man is the only creature that consumes without producing. He does not give milk, he does not lay eggs, he is too weak to pull the plough, he cannot run fast enough to catch rabbits. Yet he is lord of all the animals. He sets them to work, he gives back to them the bare minimum that will prevent them from starving, and the rest he keeps for himself.”  

“This work was strictly voluntary, but any animal who absented himself from it would have his rations reduced by half.” 

"All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others."

Jack Valiant

Yesterday we celebrated the birthday of my youngest nephew, Jack.  He is such a precious guy!

I have to say, I love my niece and both of my nephews... but Jack and I have a special connection.  I think it's because we're both "thirds."  I didn't really appreciate how significant being a "third" was until I read Ender's Game.  And it's hard to articulate, but it's something special.  On top of being "thirds," I'm pretty sure Jack will end up as one of, if not the, middle child.  (I'm here for you, Jack!).  So, yes, because of birth order and probably several other reasons yet unknown,  this little man and I have an extra something.  It's not exclusive... it's just special.

Here's a look back at Jack's first year.  [All pictures were taken from iPhone or Melissa's blog.]




 














 
Happy 1 year, Jack Valiant :)

Wednesday, October 9, 2013

31 Days of Books: Much Ado About Nothing

This week, Joss Whedon's Much Ado About Nothing was released in digital/DVD formats.  It being my favorite Shakespeare Comedy, I thought I'd make it today's review.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Title:  Much Ado About Nothing

Author:  William Shakespeare

Published:  1598


Year I read it:  2004, 2009

One sentence summary: Benedick and Beatrice are engaged in a "merry war" that is turned on its head against the backdrop of their mutual friends, Claudio and Hero, falling in love only to be tested and proved anew.

Interesting fact:  It has proven to be quite inspiring:  The characters of Beatrice and Benedick are most likely what Austen based Elizabeth and Darcy on.  Also, the lyrics of Mumford and Son's "Sigh no more" come almost entirely from this play.

Three reasons to read it:
  • It's one of Shakespeare's wittiest, most quotable plays.  Both dialogues and monologues are superb! 
  • Much Ado features some of the best romantic and dramatic tension I've seen on stage or screen!  The romance between Benedick and Beatrice is charged... with a gamut of emotions. Claudio's accusation of Hero, the subsequent scene with her father, Claudio's repentance - these weightier scenes within the comedy emphasize the narratives high stakes.
  • In spite of the aforementioned high stakes, this is one of the funniest of Shakespeare's comedies.  The lines, the plot, the characters - they blend to form one of the most delightful plays.  [This is likely why it's had so many successful adaptations]
One reason you maybe shouldn't:
  • Shakespeare plays are not PG.  They can't truly be told as PG.  If you are offended by real life non-PG material, this play is not for you.
Great quotes:
"Beatrice love me? Why?"

"Shall quips and sentences and these paper bullets of the brain awe a man from the career of his humor? No, the world must be peopled. When I said I would die a bachelor, I did not think I should live till I were married."

"Ha. 'Against my will I am sent to bid you come into dinner.' There's a double meaning in that."

"For man is a giddy thing, and this is my conclusion"

"Silence is the perfectest herald of joy: I were but little happy, if I could say how much. Lady, as you are mine, I am yours: I give away myself for you and dote upon the exchange."
"Hero itself can blot out Hero's virtue." 
"I love you with so much of my heart that none is left to protest."

"Prince, thou art sad.  Get thee a wife!"

"I was not born under a rhyming planet, nor I cannot woo in festival terms."

"Serve God, love me, and mend."

Long Way Off // Gungor


So I’m born this bundle of skin and sinew, and then after a few years I learn to speak to these other egocentric mammals who have also learned to speak. And together we come up with grand stories and, who knows, maybe experience bits of revelation from beyond the vail. But these days of ours are very short and our experience very limited. We live a few moments, and then like mist, we disappear into the Mystery from whence we came.

So why are we so arrogant?

Why do we, the mist, the sinew, the breath think that the Mystery is so small as to fit into our little brains through the extremely limited data set of information that we have access to as we clutch for our lives to this ball of dirt soaring precariously through space and time? Because as clever as we can be, we are also fools.
- Michael Gungor,


The erudite composed a thesis
Everything we see is all, all, all there is
But as an apophatic mystic
We’re a long way
We’re a long way
We’re a long way off

When the waves of time
Wash the shores stark clean
Of the memories, the last of me
With my castles gone to the constant sea
Will you stay with me
Stay with me 

To know the words in the books

This is a poem inspired by my 3-year-old nephew, Ross.  He's just beginning to learn his letters after announcing to his mom, "I don't know the words in the books like you and dad."  That line really moved me, so I wrote the following.


* * * * * * * * * * * * *

Synapses form in the child's brain -
connections of how and why and when
and where things work.
The codex marvels his months-old mind -
flipping pages, imbibing color, revealing
knowledge and narrative.
Growing older, learning the words,
hearing the stories now, and imploring,
"Read it again."
Older still, he realizes when "grown ups"
open the book, they see more than
shapes and symbols.
The child knows, implicitly - even if
inarticulately - that to some the book
offers impartation.
Seeking the gift, he whispers, "Mom,
I don't know the words in the books
like you and dad ."
So, he discovers another level of learning
Sensory of the mind, not of the fingers
or nose or tongue.
He begins the distinctly human process
of extracting meaning from symbols
and sounds from shapes.
The pain and frustration and delight of
learning become milestones on his quest
to possess this gift.
This precious boy, just setting out on
the road of language and learning
makes me marvel.
For like the little boy, I am seeking
to "know the words in the books,"
to extract the meaning.
He reminds me of the gift, of my
gratitude and of my hope to share
this impartation.

#flatmateconvos, pt. 1

So... my flatmate and I have the best conversations.  Sometimes I think back on them, or are in the middle of them and think - "wow, she/I just said that.  That's brilliant/hilarious/awful/weird/awesome/_____."  Anyway, I thought I'd start recording some of the gems for the sake of posterity.

Beks (on being single):  I may be a unicycle in a bicycle world, but I'm okay with that.

Samara:  I don't know, I just think water's pretty existential. Don't you?

Samara:  So I found out today that a guy at the office really likes Sherlock and has watched some Doctor Who.
Beks:  Oh and have you discussed baby names?
Samara:  Hamish, obvi!
Both:  Hahaha!
[For the record: I'm not that desperate!]

Both:  It doesn't have cheese?  Then it's not dinner.

Both:    "Well..."  (pronounced like "whale" with a long "l" :)
 

"When we feel strong and ready, rarely do those life altering changes come. The real changes always happen just past our borders, when we step from our native soil and our feet find new and unknown, potentially unsteady ground. We don’t know if we’ll sink, if we’ll fall, if we’ll ever be able to move again. But then we do, and we just pray our movements have some grace to them, because we’ve little idea where we are and little idea how to get where we’re going. Courage isn’t that remarkable sensation of feeling strong – it’s not the memorized, sure steps down streets we own and know by heart – courage is the messy movements past our native soil."
- Katrina Hope


*Just some words from Uncommon to get your day started off right.

Tuesday, October 8, 2013

31 days of Books: The Woman in White

Title:  The Woman in White

Author:  Wilkie Collins

Published: 1860

Year I read it:  2012

One sentence summary:  In the (arguably) first ever English mystery novel, Collins explores class and family through the lens of artist and perfect gentleman, Walter Hartright, loving, losing, and learning about one family's strange past and how they could possibly connected to the woman in white.

Interesting fact:  Dickens published it as a serial in his publication All the Year Round.

Three reasons to read it:
  • It's a 700 page, Victorian page-turner.  This mystery is so much more than "whodunnit."  The characters, the motives, the psychology - they're all so riveting.
  • Collins far exceeds his friend Dickens when it comes to female characters (and, in my opinion, his prose in general... but I don't want to offend).  I remember thinking I was reading a cross between Charles Dickens and Charlotte Bronte.
  • Looking back on this book I remember and cherish it not for its resolution, but for itself.  The process is a beautiful one.

One reason you maybe shouldn't:
  • Although I applaud Collins advance of the female character, I felt he gave into the trope of women who were either beautiful & helpless or ugly & active.  Why not a woman who both has agency and is desirable?  [There were times I almost wished Walter had fallen for the active Mariann rather than the stunning Laura.  But only almost.]
Great quote:
“I have always held the old-fashioned opinion that the primary object of work of fiction should be to tell a story.” 
“Women can resist a man's love, a man's fame, a man's personal appearance, and a man's money, but they cannot resist a man's tongue when he knows how to talk to them.”  
“This is the story of what a Woman's patience can endure, and what a Man's resolution can achieve.” 

costume dilemma

You guys... I'm so ready to throw myself into choosing a costume, piecing it together... but I just cannot decide!

Star Wars?  Super heroes?  Disney?  Doctor Who? They're done every year.

Sherlock?  Always an option.  A friend and I had talked about doing a Femlock cosplay (fandom translator: she and I were going as male Sherlock characters).  But I will be doing a costume for the premiere party (just waiting on a date, Moffat!) - so I'm not sure that's "it."

Alice in wonderland?  Done it.

Lord of the Rings?  Did it last year.

Grumpy Cat?  Seriously tempting

A different Lizzie Bennet Diaries character would be "totes supes adorbs" ...but I have done it twice already this year.

Perfecting my Suzie Bishop look (from Moonrise Kingdom) would be a blast for sure... but I kinda want to tackle something new.

Would it be considered cheating to dress up like Zooey Deschanel?  [I was afraid people might stop commenting both when I went red and especially after I chopped my hair off... there has been no letting up, which is fine with me]

So then I look at books I've read or re-read this year.

Half of the are from the Enderverse.  Not really any impressive or indicative costumes from the enderverse.

Gatsby?  Everyone's going to do Gatsby this year.  [I'm afraid I've turned into a hipster cosplayer... sorry]

Hazel Grace?  Augustus Waters?  I think Augustus would actually be more fun... but with TFioS film coming out next year... 

Name of the Wind character?  Could be super fun, but very few people would recognize it.

TV shows?  

One of my coworkers seriously suggested I dress up as Jesse Pinkman from Breaking Bad.  That would be... intriguing.

I guess there are a bunch of Once Upon a Time costumes... comme ci comme ça.

I might be perusing classic Hollywood next.  Hmmm...

Pretty much... I need a man in my life so we can go as a couple :)

Got suggestions for me?  Leave a comment ;)

Monday, October 7, 2013

31 Days of Books: Northanger Abbey

In light of today's Emma Approved premiere, I decided to hilight one of her lesser known works in today's 31 post.  Enjoy!

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Title:  Northanger Abbey

Author:  Jane Austen

Published: 1817 (posthumously)

Year I read it:  2009

One sentence summary:  Told in the form of a gothic parody, Northanger Abbey tells the story of the young, imaginative, and naive Catherine Moreland, expecting to find some dark secret around every corner, instead has to learn to navigate the every-day worldliness of the people around her.

Fun fact:
  • There are hints that Austen intended this to be published under the title "Catherine," in the style of the heroine-eponymous Emma.  Instead, the publishers decided on an estate name, similar to the title of Mansfield Park.
Three reasons to read it:
  •  It is lighthearted in a way that none of the other 5 novels can compare.  There are delightful moments where I found myself laughing not at Catherine, but with her.  I could identify with her dark-and-stormy-night assumptions.
  • Austen excels at The Awkward, especially here.  Never has a carriage ride been more high-stakes or a side comment been more mus-construed.
  • Henry [flipping] Tilney!  I know, I know.  Darcy is perfect.  He really is.  But Henry I'd take Henry.  He's funny with a sarcastic edge, ever so gentle when he needs to be, is not proud or entitled, and is, overall, really adorably endearing.
One reason you maybe shouldn't:
  • Austen didn't get a chance to finish editing this before she passed away, so there are few things that might be outside of or not quite up to people's expectations of Austen.
 Great quote:
“It would be mortifying to the feelings of many ladies, could they be made to understand how little the heart of a man is affected by what is costly or new in their attire... Woman is fine for her own satisfaction alone. No man will admire her the more, no woman will like her the better for it. Neatness and fashion are enough for the former, and a something of shabbiness or impropriety will be most endearing to the latter.”  


"I shall make but a poor figure in your journal tomorrow... Yes, I know exactly what you will say: Friday, went to the Lower Rooms; wore my sprigged muslin robe with blue trimmings -- plain black shoes -- appeared to much advantage; but was strangely harassed by a queer, half-witted man, who would make me dance with him, and distressed me by his nonsense." [Henry Tilney, ladies and gentleman]


“The person, be it gentlemen or lady, who has not pleasure in a good novel, must be intolerably stupid.”


“It is only a novel... or, in short, only some work in which the greatest powers of the mind are displayed, in which the most thorough knowledge of human nature, the happiest delineation of its varieties, the liveliest effusions of wit and humour, are conveyed to the world in the best-chosen language”

Writing: Author, Narrator, Character

Hello!  Today I'm sharing something I've been excited to tell you about for a while.  Back in August, my good friend, Lois, contacted me about joining a new mini-writing group.  We would be creating stories round-robin style: each person would begin a story, pass it along to the next person, and by the end of the project, we would have four separate stories with four authors each. 

We got together yesterday for a tea party to unveil our four pieces.  It was such a blast!  We laughed over each unexpected plot twist (and over the persistent fandom references - do we get to count those as "intertextuality"?).  But the laughter was certainly not caused by poor writing.  Both during the writing process and looking back on it, I was consistently impressed by the caliber of the these ladies.  We all quickly agreed we will be doing this again!
[The four writers* and their tea** pot]
*Nancy, myself, Lois, and Sami
Also, I love that we're all in dresses and skirts
**tea powers writing

I wanted to share at least one of the pieces as an example.  This is less of a story, but it was one of my favorites.  We closed with this one and I was honestly moved by it.  Nancy turned to me and asked, "Samara, are you crying?"  No... ok, maybe tearing up.  I just really love this piece.

So without further ado:
Author, Narrator, Character
Lois:

I could write an entire novel about hands, she thought. Wouldn’t that be interesting.
The problem with writing has always been first sentences. There are too many good ones already written. How could she possibly compete?
Mrs. Dalloway said she would buy the flowers herself.
There was no possibility of taking a walk that day.
It is a truth universally acknowledged that, a single man in possession of a good fortune must be in want of a wife.
As Gregor Samsa awoke from a night of uneasy dreaming, he found himself transformed in his bed into a giant insect.
How do you even begin? she wondered.
The dreamy poorly-dressed twelve year old of her past had no qualms about beginnings. A prologue came to her in an evening and she began chapter one the next morning.
A boy, about the age of 17, lying in a dark and musty dungeon. 
Oh lord, she groaned. Scintillating writing my dear.
And a character. She needed a character. Someone for her readers to love and identity with. Someone they would root for.
Herself?
Is she the character of this story?

Excuse me, let’s just pause a moment and remove this layer of third-person narrative. Can I do that? Is that allowed?

I am the author. And the narrator. And the character. And I am rather pleased to make your acquaintance. Would a formal introduction be considered tacky? Or cliché?

We interrupt this story that you have just started reading and are probably about to put down because honestly what is even happening here for a relatively important announcement.

An open letter to future high school students and possibly future English majors:

If you are reading this short story because I became an award-winning, world-famous author and this pithy piece of writing is deemed important enough to be studied in a class and you have to write a paper about something to do with this story, here is an idea: metafiction. I love all things meta. And already, there has been plenty of metafiction. Also intertextuality. Ask your teacher.

Sincerely,

the author, narrator, and character


Thank you for your patience.

What’s all this, you must be asking.

What indeed.
She was asking herself a similar question. Lying on her bed. Drinking tea. Writing a story.
What was it all about, this living thing?
And…
was she even alive?

Samara: 

And if author, did she create? Or if character, did she discover? But if narrator, whose script was she using?

Thus beginning the cycle again.
At times I was one, then the other. Now I am all three.
Three-sided. Externally, multi-faceted. Internally, trapped?
No matter. She defined, was defined by those three sides.
Honor. Hero. Hate.
Awarded. Awkward. Ambivalent.
Make. Made. Mediator.
Author. Character. Narrator.

But then, enough introspection. She could introspect all day.
And wasn't that what had ruined her in the first place?
Yes. No. Moving along.

Hands!
"Hands touching hands."
Hands to work.
Hands show age or vigor.
Hands in marriage.
For saints have hands that pilgrims' hands do touch,
And palm to palm is holy palmers' kiss.

I'm telling you - intertextuality...

Nancy

But which hands to write about?
Which hands, which story of hands, are most worthy?
She wondered.
I wondered.
The problem with inspiration is finding it in the first place.
Does one look for it, or simply wait around for its arrival?
I can look under rocks, inside the working gears of an old clock, or in the works of the great writers before her.

After her, even?

But although one can look high and low for that magic spark of inspiration, one can never guarantee a result.
Perhaps I must wait for that spark, that neuron surge erupts in your brain which will expand the horizons of my subconscious.
Am I—is she—even worthy of being a protagonist? Is this plot worthy of consumption?
Will my tale will quickly fade among the multitudes of other mediocre fictions?
In the world. In the word.

She lies in her bed, buried in her head.
Why?
Why do I want/need/crave this story be written?


Her tea grows cold in her cup in her hand in her room.
The question haunts her skull, eats her soul.

Is she alive? Am I alive because I—a being of some abstract sort—feel alive?
Do I look well if no one else can see me? Can a voice make sense if no one hears it? What proof have I that I matter if no one else validates my very existence? Perhaps I am myself a mere idea. A figment of imagination of that bored college student lying on her bed.

Her tea was drained, her eyes were strained.

She is all three parts of the cycle—author, narrator, character.
And yet…why does she feel so alone?

Look under more rocks, my dear. Perhaps there is another element? An ingredient as of yet missing?
I look up.
What do I see?

Hands.
Hands??
Whose hands?
….Your hands?

Hello! Who are you? I was so wrapped up in myself and all of these intertextual deep deep thoughts, that I forgot that there was another person in the room.

How could I have forgotten the hands of my reader!
Your beautifully unique and curious hands, which hold my pages even now.

You are the inspiration that I have been looking for. I realize now what had been missing from my story: someone to listen.

How strange…is it very often that the author-narrator-character falls in love with their reader?

Another open letter:

You may be asking yourself how on earth the Author/Narrator/Character of a short story could fall in love with you, The Reader, when so many before you have read this same short story.

The answer: because each time a new person reads a story, they make it their own and adopt their own reaction. This is not a one-way monologue, my sweet, sweet Reader. This is a conversation. I am interested in what you have to say.

Sincerely,

Your beloved Author, Narrator, and Character


But…what will happen once my story ends?
Will my life end as well? Will we never speak again?
My voice feels complete now… my voice is being heard across the wrinkles of time and space.
It is up to you now, how this relationship continues.

Sami

I set down your pages and feel my world rock a little. How. How could this amazing author know? I have fallen in love with these pages. My teacher assigned this well-known author and I thought you would be one of the many generic, boring assignments of my life. He wants us to respond to you, the Author, Narrator and Character.

You have made me contemplate my own validity. How I interpret my own reality. I hold you in my hands and I wonder what you, the Author, Narrator, Character once held and who else has held you and been drastically changed.

I want you to know you are heard and that the greatest gift of all is to love and be loved in return.

There you go. Intertextuality.

Love,
Your Reader

Bob walks by while I'm typing away.

"Smile, Samara.  ...Pretend you work the back office of the Shire.  They must have admin in Hobbiton." 


I think I need a sign that reads "Official Hobbiton Admin" or something like that.

Emma Approved! Episode 1

Emma is out!!

And here's a re-enactment of my reactions to their first video:

AHHHH!  It's finally here!  Monday's can be happy again!

Emma's not blonde - wow.

LOVE that they worked in the first line!

The wink... Emma would do that.

Ah, the Westons.  
Good backdrop for Emma's office... and the pink blazer and matching lipstick suits her.
Knightley!  Makes sense.  I mean, who would wait 60 episodes to introduce a key character like that?

Why isn't his name "George"?  I mean, I know, it does sound a bit old fashioned, and that we just had 2 royal babies named George (Will & Kate's, Mary & Matthew's) - but did you really have to change it?  To Alex?

Oooh... multiple cameras.

Um... I still don't understand who her audience is.  Like, there needs to be an in-world reason, why these videos are being uploaded to the Internet.  (But this is only the first episode so I will wait patiently for reasons...  Um... is it Thursday yet?)

Emma needs an assistant?  Entrer Harriet Smith?

Knightley seems to translate well to 21st Century America.

Ok... wow.  Please stop winking already.

Call off the wedding?  Oh my!  Trouble in Highbury?  Not Emma Approved!




Such fun!  Though I'm not sure anything will be able to match the experience the Lizzie Bennet Diaries gave me, I am very much looking forward to this new adaptation!  Great job, Pemberly Digital!

Sunday, October 6, 2013

31 Days of Books: Study in Scarlet

Title: A Study in Scarlet

Author:  Sir Arthur Conan Doyle

Published:  1887

Year I read it:  2011

One sentence summary:  Holmes & Watson's first ever case is about a series of mysterious deaths, told in a novella from Watson's perspective.

Three reasons to read it:
  • It's where it all began for Sherlock & Watson - it's quite remarkable, knowing what follows, to read John's (and by extension, Doyle's) first impression of Sherlock. 
  • This case (along with a handful of others like Sign of Four, Scandal in Bohemia, and The Final Problem) allows some of the most space for its characters. Nearly every Holmes mystery interesting, but some draw you closer to the characters than others. 
  • I find Doyle's perspective on Americans - especially specific communities - most intriguing. This case of London murders is connected to Mormonism, while The Five Orange Pips delves into the KKK. Fascinating (even if flawed) commentary on both. 


One reason you maybe shouldn't:

  • It's the beginning, but it's not the most famous Sherlock story. It's also one of 3 Holmes novellas, while the rest of the cases are found within collections of short stories. If you want something shorter, go with The Adventure of Sherlock Holme & it's first story, "Scandal of Bohemia."

Great quotes:

“To a great mind, nothing is little,' remarked Holmes, sententiously.” 
“Once you have ruled out the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.” [Yes, he said it first!  Spock quoted him.] 
“A summary list of Sherlock Holmes's strengths and weaknesses:

  1. Knowledge of Literature: Nil. 
  2. Knowledge of Philosophy: Nil. 
  3. Knowledge of Astronomy: Nil.
  4. Knowledge of Politics: Feeble.
  5. Knowledge of Botany: Variable. Well up in belladonna, opium, and poisons generally. Knows nothing of practical gardening. 
  6. Knowledge of Geology: Practical but limited. Tells at a glance different soils from each other. After walks has shown me splashes upon his trousers, and told me by their colour and consistence in what part of London he had received them. 
  7. Knowledge of Chemistry: Profound. 
  8. Knowledge of Anatomy: Accurate but unsystematic. 
  9. Knowledge of Sensational Literature: Immense. He appears to know every detail of every horror perpetrated in the century. 
  10. Plays the violin well. 
  11. Is an expert singlestick player, boxer, and swordsman. 
  12. Has a good practical knowledge of British law."

Saturday, October 5, 2013

31 Days of Books: The Count of Monte Cristo

I was working on a different review this morning until I wrote today's date: the Fifth of October.  And the Fifth of October is Alexandre Dumas day, so The Count got bumped up.  
Due to several significant events in the novel, particularly the final event, the closing chapter is entitled "The Fifth of October."  
Also, I've decided one more piece of criteria for these reviews: an interesting fact.  [I'm hoping to go back and add this to the last several posts.]


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Title:  The Count of Monte Cristo

Author:  Alexandre Dumas

Published:  1844

Year I read it:  2005

One sentence summary:  The classic story of Edmond Dantes: poised for success before being falsely accused, losing everything, and becoming bent on revenge before discovering the triumph of forgiveness & redemption.

Three reasons to read it:

  • A books closing lines are some of the most important words & a few books I've read absolutely excel (Tale of Two Cities, Return of the King, etc), but, for me, none can yet compare to The Count of Monte Cristo! [Hence, the title of my blog.] 
  • A great author must succeed in plot, character, and style and, in my opinion, Dumas hits a grand slam!  The characters are universal, the plot unforgettable, and his style is sentimental enough to make me very happy.
  • For being 1,500 pages, it hardly stalls.  I've read books 1/5 its length that felt longer.  There is so much action in this story it, quite literarily, approaches the proper standards of being "epic."

One reason you maybe shouldn't: 

  • It's length - it did take me 3 months, since it overlapped with school.  If you think you couldn't possibly conquer something that long,  this is one of the rare occasions I would recommend an abridged.  I read the Bantam abridged a year or so before reading the full edition, and it was quite good.
Interesting fact:
  • Dumas entitled all 117  chapters.

Great quote:

[Warning: The only quote I'm sharing comes from the last chapter, and only because I'm presuming most people know the general premise of the novel.  If you don't want to read it, that's fine.  If you do, know the context is in a letter from the Count to a dear friend.]


Tell the angel who will watch over your future destiny to pray sometimes for a man who, like Satan, thought himself, for an instant, equal to God; but who now acknowledges with Christian humility, that God alone possesses supreme power and infinite wisdom.  Perhaps those prayers may soften the remorse he feels in his heart...There is neither happiness nor misery in the world; there is only the comparison of one state with another, nothing more.  He who has felt the deepest grief is best able to experience supreme happiness.  We must have felt what it is to die, that we may appreciate the enjoyments of life.Live, then, and be happy, and never forget, that until the day when God will deign to reveal the future to man, all human wisdom is contained in these two words -- "Wait and hope."


Friday, October 4, 2013

31 Days of Books: A Wrinkle in Time

I'm continuing today in the vein of fantasy - because I love it!  But I have to confess I read (and fell in love) with this particular book in 3rd grade... and a re-read is long overdue.  So pardon any lack of specificity.  ("Spe-ci-fi-ci-ty." - JGL to TH in Inception... sorry, couldn't resist.)  Alright, on with the show!

* * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Title:  A Wrinkle in Time

Author:  Madeleine L'Engle

Published:  1962

Year I read it: 1999

One sentence summary:  Meg Murray accompanied by her brother, Charles Wallace; friend, Calvin O'Keefe; and the three odd Mrs W's (Whatsit, Who, and Which) goes on an adventure in search of her scientist-father after his mysterious disappearance years before.


Three reasons to read it:
  • I can't even convey the power of the climax - a struggle between the law and conformity and death against love and light and life.  Of the books and movies you read/see as a child - some stick with you for inexplicable reasons - this would be one!
  • This novel was one of the early nerd-slash-social-outcast-becomes-hero books.  Living in a post-Harry Potter world (and thanks to a majority of other YA novels),  this combination has gone from trope to epidemic, but I've found reading the source of a cliche refreshes the notion of it.
  • I often can't parse out where sci-fi ends and fantasy begins [it makes for fantastic late night conversations though!] - but this story is a wonderful blending of both.  The fourth and fifth dimensions, tesseracting, far off planets, impossible happenings, adventures and humanity - it all makes for some fabulous literature.
  • [Bonus reason:  Whovians would just LOVE this book.  All sorts of wibbly-wobbly, timey-wimey in here]

One reason you maybe shouldn't:
  • It's a children's story and doesn't exactly follow a logical or expected plot progression... [I don't know, does that turn you off? No, ok...good :]
Great quotes:

"...by the way, there is such a thing as a tesseract."
"Life, with its rules, its obligations, and its freedoms, is like a sonnet: You're given the form, but you have to write the sonnet yourself."
"Believing takes practice."

"A straight line is not the shortest distance between two points."
“I don't understand it any more than you do, but one thing I've learned is that you don't have to understand things for them to be.” 

"I love you, Charles Wallace."

Thursday, October 3, 2013

31 Days of Books: At the Back of the North Wind

Thanks to everyone who has shared their excitement over this project.  I'm happy to finally be getting some thoughts and recommendations out there.  I've come up with a list, but if there are any specific books I've read (or you think I've read) that you'd like to read my mini-review of, please leave a comment below!  Thanks again for reading :)


* * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Title: At the Back of the North Wind

Author: George MacDonald

Published: 1871

Year I read it: 2008

One sentence summary: The fantastical tale of a boy named Diamond going on adventures with the North Wind and, eventually, to the land that lies at her back. 

Three reasons to read it:

  • MacDonald's fantasy is tantamount! Chesterton, Lewis, Tolkien - they wouldn't be who they are without it. 
  • This is a beautiful depiction both of God's sovereignty and of child-like faith. 
  • Immersing yourself in awe & mystery for a few hundred pages does wonders for the soul 

One reason you maybe shouldn't:


  • My brothers tease me mercilessly, saying this book is really creepy, partly because of their interpretation of the ending, partly because it's their job to tease me.  (May I assure you, it's rather beautiful!) 

Great quote:

I begin to think there are better things than being comfortable.

A poet is a man who is glad of something, and tries to make other people glad of it too.

Only he knew that to be left alone is not always to be forsaken.
This whole passage.

“Keeping journals always makes me nervous people are going to find it so if you’re reading this just stop. Don't be a journal reader. Those people suck.”
- Jennifer Lawrence,
first entry in a new journal

Here's a weekly reminder of how amazing Jennifer Lawrence is.